A study published introduces the Foundational IVF Model for Imaging (FEMI), a new approach for embryo assessment in in vitro fertilization (IVF). The study evaluated FEMI performance on ploidy prediction, blastulation time prediction, embryo component segmentation, blastocyst quality scoring, embryo witnessing, and stage prediction.
Study
A successful IVF is dependent on accurate assessment and selection of viable embryos. Traditional embryo assessment methods have many limitations, including a lack of standardization, high costs, and varying regulations concerning preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) across different countries.
Variations in scoring systems and diagnostic tools significantly affect proper embryo selection, which may adversely affect IVF success rates and patient outcomes. Therefore, a more efficient, affordable, and non-invasive method is urgently required to assess embryos to improve IVF success rates and prevent the emotional and financial strain on patients.
The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in IVF
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been employed to predict embryos' morphology and ploidy status, which is crucial for a successful IVF procedure. Although many deep learning models, such as STORK and ERICA, have shown considerable potential in analyzing embryo morphology based on images, these models rely on image-based data and embryologist input.
Researchers have continued to address the shortcomings and have developed new models with higher efficacy or improved the predictive accuracy of existing models. For example, Blastocyst Evaluation Learning Algorithm (BELA) can predict ploidy status using a multitask learning approach without any embryologist assistance. However, this model is limited to predicting embryo quality scores and ploidy status.
Vision Transformers (ViTs) are a foundation model architecture with a transformer-based approach. This approach allows the model to capture complex patterns within images. Another advantage of ViTs is their ability to process large-scale data. Although this approach has been employed to develop IVFormer, its application is constrained due to insufficient training dataset diversity.
FEMI Findings
The performance of FEMI on ploidy prediction tasks was compared against various benchmark image and video-based models, such as a MoViNet model, VGG16, EfficientNet V2, ResNet101-RS, ConvNext, and CoAtNet. This study observed that FEMI significantly outperforms all comparison models. It also demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting ploidy under conditions of low embryo quality.
The current study highlighted that FEMI significantly outperformed other reference models on overall blastocyst score (BS) and inner cell mass score prediction in multiple datasets. FEMI also outperformed all models for the expansion and trophectoderm scores in both image and video inputs.
Blastocyst components segmentation, such as zona pellucida (ZP), the trophectoderm, and inner cell mass, is crucial in the visualization and downstream analytical processes. However, FEMI did not significantly outperform other models in these tasks; it showed a non-significant increase in Dice score, suggesting comparable performance.
FEMI outperformed all comparison models for embryo witnessing in all datasets except the Weill ES dataset. Accurately predicting blastulation time helps embryologists assess embryo quality and plan subsequent visualization processes. FEMI could accurately predict the hours post-insemination at which an embryo begins to form a blastocyst.
It is important to accurately predict the embryo stage to monitor the developmental progression and optimize outcomes in IVF procedures. For FEMI and other benchmark models, embryo classification was formulated as a regression task rather than a traditional classification problem, allowing for finer prediction granularity. In this task, FEMI achieved a top-1 accuracy of 60.31%, comparable to Embryovision’s 60.58%, and outperformed the performances of the other models. These findings highlighted the advantage of using SSL on large-scale, unlabeled data to process complex developmental features.
While FEMI consistently showed strong results, the degree of improvement varied across datasets and tasks.
Conclusion
While FEMI demonstrated high performance across various tasks, the authors note several significant limitations. The segmentation and stage prediction tasks were trained and tested on the same datasets due to limited labelled data, potentially affecting generalizability. Ploidy prediction excluded mosaic embryos and only used data up to 112 hpi, although some viable embryos developed later.
Many datasets were from high-resource clinics, which may limit FEMI’s immediate applicability in lower-resource or highly variable clinical environments.
Despite these limitations, FEMI’s design as a foundation model enables future fine-tuning and adaptation with broader datasets. The authors suggest using it as a backbone for other clinical prediction tasks, such as implantation or live birth, pending access to relevant labels.
The study presents FEMI as a promising tool to standardize and improve embryo assessment in IVF. Using self-supervised learning on a large, diverse dataset allows it to generalize well across tasks and outperform traditional models. The authors acknowledge its limitations, including segmentation performance and dataset scope, and these should be considered when evaluating its clinical use. With further validation and clinical trials, FEMI could serve as a powerful decision-support system in reproductive medicine.
Source:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20250715/FEMI-helps-predict-IVF-outcomes-with-greater-accuracy.aspx