The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has claimed more than 6.92 million lives and infected over 765 million individuals. Most COVID-19 vaccines target the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD) to prevent the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor.
Study
A recent study discusses the results of the randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III vaccine trial that assessed the safety profile, immunogenicity, and efficacy of FINLAY-FR-1A in Iran. To this end, Cohort 1 was used to evaluate the two-dose regimen of FINLAY-FR-2 (25 μg), whereas Cohort 2 was administered a two-dose regimen of FINLAY-FR-2 with a third dose of FINLAY-FR-1A (50 μg).
In this study, participants were recruited from eight different cities. Cohort 1 included 17,319 participants from six cities, and Cohort 2 comprised 5,521 volunteers from two cities.
All participants were adults between 18 and 80 years of age without SARS-CoV-2 infection or a history of COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, no candidates had congenital or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, chronic liver disease, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease.
Two doses of FINLAY-FR-2 were administered intramuscularly, 28 days apart. In cohort 2, FINLAY-FR-1A was introduced as a third dose on day 56. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure anti-S1 IgG levels.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 39.3 years in Cohort 1 and 39.7 years in Cohort 2. No significant difference in age was observed between the vaccinated and placebo groups.
Two doses of FINLAY-FR-2 in cohort 1 had effectively prevented COVID-19. The vaccine efficacy (VE) of cohort 1 was estimated against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection at 49.7%, severe infection at 76.8%, and infection–related hospitalizations at 77.7%.
For cohort 2, VE was significantly higher after the third vaccine dose. More specifically, this vaccine regimen was associated with a VE of 64.9% for preventing symptomatic infection and 96.6% against severe infection and hospitalization.
The VE of the current trial was lower as compared to that of the Phase III randomized trial conducted in Cuba, which could be due to differences in the infection intensity and comorbidities of the study cohorts. Notably, the VE estimated in this study was during Delta variant dominance.
Conclusion
Effective protein-based COVID-19 vaccines could have a greater potential due to their stability and easier distribution. Likewise, the study findings indicate that FINLAY-FR-2 could be used as an affordable and effective third COVID-19 vaccine dose in resource-limited settings.
Two of the key strengths of this study are its large sample size and geographically diverse participants. Nevertheless, the current study has some limitations, including a selection of participants with controlled underlying diseases, which could influence VE.
The authors also failed to perform serological analysis for all participants at baseline due to limited resources. Since older age groups were prioritized for COVID-19 mass vaccination and previously vaccinated individuals were excluded from this trial, this could reduce the generalizability of the finding.
Despite these limitations, the FINLAY-FR-2 vaccine and FINLAY-FR-1A as a booster dose were effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both FINLAY-FR-2 and FINLAY-FR-1A were well-tolerated among the participants and exhibited a prominent safety profile.
Source:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230507/The-safety-and-efficacy-of-FINLAY-FR-21A-a-new-protein-based-COVID-19-vaccine.aspx