About Us

Tridha Scholars means “Independent Scholars” is a group which is solely working for the growth of the researchers, scholars and students by publishing their valuable manuscripts.

Tridhascholars, a leading global scientific group which is providing platforms to researchers and scholars in academics, institutions and R&D departments of different fields with quality content through information, products and services.

Our mission is always focused on helping our customers, wherever they are students, scholars or scientific researchers. It leads the way in advancing science, medicine, technologies, and healthcare. We share the commitment with researchers, scholars for advancement in recent developments of scientific research in various fields.

We totally understand the world in which clinicians, academicians and corporate researchers are working, the outcomes they want to achieve and the challenges they face in achieving them.

Open Access

Now days, most publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles need not to pay to access them online. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way (Reprints) must obtain permission from the publisher and is often required to pay an additional fee.

Although many researchers can access the journals they need via their institution or by themselves as that is freely accessible.

Open Access is when publications are freely available online to all at no cost and with limited restrictions without any barriers. The unrestricted distribution of research is especially important for authors (as their work gets seen by more people), readers (as they can access and build on the most recent work in the field) and funders (as the work they fund has broader impact by being able to reach a wider audience).

 

Peer Review Process

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers/reviewers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity, and significance to help editors determine whether a manuscript should be published in the journal.

Peer review process is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the manuscript. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help in improving the quality of the manuscripts they review.

When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, it is assessed to see if it meets the criteria for submission.

Each manuscript is checked for plagiarism/similar content, and assessed carefully to determine if it fits the aims and scope of the journal. If it does, the editorial team will select potential peer reviewers within the field of research to peer-review the manuscript and make recommendations.

All submit articles are subject to peer review. The publishing house will send manuscripts to outside reviewers selected from an extensive database.

Upon submission, authors are encouraged to submit names of reviewers who they deem appropriate to review their paper. Authors may also indicate persons to whom they do not wish the manuscript sent for review. Articles will be reviewed by at least two reviewers as well as the editorial staff to determine validity, significance, novelty, and potential impact on the field of contents and conclusions. The selection of reviewers will be made on the basis of expertise, impartiality, and equal distribution among the available experts, regardless of geographic origin of the manuscript or locations of the reviewers.

On their recommendation, editors will accept, accept with revisions, or reject a manuscript.

To make good judgments, peer reviewers evaluate the content for scientific value and originality, to see that articles adhere to general scientific practice as well as the journal’s specific guidelines, and to check that author have referenced correctly. The peer reviewer will look closely at the methodology and the validity of the data, and consider the ethical approach. They will then recommend changes. Authors will be advised within the shortest possible time whether their paper is accepted, requires major or minor revisions, or else gets rejected. All necessary efforts will be made to ensure a timely review process.

Authors should note the time from submission to final decision can be shortened by a timely return of a revised manuscript when revision has been requested.

Journal of Clinical Cases and Reports reserves the right to make the final selection of peer reviewers. Journal of Clinical Cases and Reports also reserves the right, at its discretion, to determine the number and kind of manuscripts sent for review, the number of reviewers, the reviewing procedures, and the use made of reviewers’ opinions. In addition to scientific merit, the Editor-in-Chief/Editor reserves the right to evaluate papers without external peer review. Effort is made to complete the review process in a timely manner.

 

Anti-Plagiarism Policy

Authors
Journal of Clinical Cases and Reports (JOCCRS) regards plagiarism as a very serious offence. It is an illegal form of copying. The journal uses PlagScan to screen the articles for plagiarism.

Plagiarism is defined as the unacknowledged use of the work of others as if this were your own original work.
Examples of plagiarism: 

  • Copying and pasting from the Internet and posting somewhere else without proper citation
  • Putting your name on another person’s essay or project
  • Copying exact wording from another person’s text
  • Using another person’s photo, diagram, tables, sounds, or ideas without proper citation
  • Presenting research in your own words without providing references
  • Purchasing another person’s text and using it as your own
  • Presenting ideas in the same format and order as your research source

By submitting paper for publication to the journal, Author(s) certify that: 

  • I/We are fully aware that plagiarism is wrong
  • I/We know that plagiarism is the use of another person’s idea or published work and to pretend that it is one’s own.
  • I/ We declare that each contribution to your project from the work(s) of other peoples published works or unpublished sources have been acknowledged and source of information have been referenced.
  • I/We certify that you are solely responsible for any incomplete reference that may remain in my/our work.

Anti-plagiarism Declaration 
         I have read and understood the Journal of Clinical Cases and Reports rules on plagiarism. I hereby declare that this piece of written work is the result of my own independent scholarly work, and that in all cases material   from the work of others (in books, articles, essays, dissertations, and on the internet) is acknowledged, and quotations and paraphrases are clearly indicated. No material other than that listed has been used. This written work has not previously not yet been published.